IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cve/innsjn/v2y2022i3p145-151.html

Econometric evaluation of the productivity of the court in the process of consideration of criminal proceedings on the example of the work of the Higher Anti-Corruption Court

Author

Listed:
  • Denys Giulmagomedov

Abstract

The article presents the results of an econometric assessment of the weighted average time of consideration of criminal proceedings by the High Anti-Corruption Court, which was carried out according to an alternative approach to the methodology of the State Judicial Administration of Ukraine. As a result of the research, it was established that the actual weighted average time of consideration of criminal proceedings may be more than 84 hours of net procedural time or more than 3 calendar years, contrary to the normative assessment of the State Judicial Administration, according to which the weighted average time of consideration of criminal proceedings is 9 hours and 11 minutes. The basis of the current assessment is the data of the 3-year monitoring of proceedings by the High AntiCorruption Court of a sample of criminal proceedings that were studied. Taking into account that the limited number of investigated data does not reflect the total number of criminal proceedings pending before the High Anti-Corruption Court, as well as the fact that at the time of evaluation only 19 out of 53 criminal proceedings under investigation were completed, the obtained results should be considered preliminary and that need to be reassessed in the future. However, the trend of the research data indicates that the revaluation, most likely, will correct the estimated weighted average time of consideration of criminal proceedings in the direction of increase, i.e. the difference with the normative and calculation data of the State Judicial Administration will grow. The results of this study can become an impetus or a basis for further research on the productivity of the judicial system in the consideration of criminal cases

Suggested Citation

  • Denys Giulmagomedov, 2022. "Econometric evaluation of the productivity of the court in the process of consideration of criminal proceedings on the example of the work of the Higher Anti-Corruption Court," Innovation and Sustainability Articles, Innovation and Sustainability, vol. 2(3), pages 145-151, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:cve:innsjn:v:2:y:2022:i:3:p:145-151
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.31649/ins.2022.3.145.151
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://inns.vn.ua/web/uploads/pdf/Giulmagomedov.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.31649/ins.2022.3.145.151?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cve:innsjn:v:2:y:2022:i:3:p:145-151. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Innovation and Sustainability (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://inns.vn.ua/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.