IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/wotrrv/v25y2026i4p_6.html

Institutions, Governance, and Intra-regional Trade Margins: Complementarities or Reciprocity in the Economic Community of West African States?

Author

Listed:
  • Fadiran, David

Abstract

This study investigates how institutional interactions shape bilateral trade dynamics within the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS), focusing on product-level trade composition, diversification, and the role of governance. Despite regional integration efforts, ECOWAS has seen limited export diversification and modest intra-regional growth in trade. Using a gravity model and detailed bilateral trade data, the study examines how the combined governance quality of trading partners influences trade flows, extensive margins (products per partner, and partners per product), and intensive margins (trade volumes, values, and average value per product per partner). The analysis highlights governance complementarities as key drivers of trade structure within the region. Results show that regulatory quality between trading partners is associated with greater product concentration, while complementarities in political stability support broader geographic market reach across trading partners. Reciprocity effects are also observed in the case of political institutions, suggesting that governance alignment reinforces trade ties. Voice and accountability displays a complementarity effect on the average value per product per partner, deepening bilateral trade relationships. These findings highlight the importance of understanding governance and institutions coordination and the interplay in enhancing intra-ECOWAS trade integration and carry broader implications for regional efforts such as the African Continental Free Trade Agreement (AfCFTA).

Suggested Citation

  • Fadiran, David, 2026. "Institutions, Governance, and Intra-regional Trade Margins: Complementarities or Reciprocity in the Economic Community of West African States?," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 25(4), pages -6, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:wotrrv:v:25:y:2026:i:4:p:_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1474745626101542/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:wotrrv:v:25:y:2026:i:4:p:_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/wtr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.