IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/wotrrv/v21y2022i1p93-108_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Who Uses the EU's Free Trade Agreements? A Transaction-Level Analysis of the EU–South Korea FTA

Author

Listed:
  • Kasteng, Jonas
  • Kokko, Ari
  • Tingvall, Patrik

Abstract

The tariff preferences in FTAs do not apply automatically to all imports. Instead, importers can request to use the tariff preferences, but must then show that the imported goods fulfil the formal requirements (e.g. rules of origin) of the FTA. This is costly, which is a likely reason why tariff preferences are not always used. This research note examines preference utilization under the FTA between the EU and South Korea, which was formally ratified in 2015 (but had been provisionally applied from 2011). We use firm and transaction level data for Swedish imports from South Korea during November 2016 to answer the question ‘Who uses the EU's FTAs?’ With information on firm size, product category, import mode (direct imports or customs warehousing), preference margin, potential duty savings, and transaction size, we provide a detailed picture of when firms choose to utilize the tariff preferences. The results suggest that the differences across importers are not primarily related to firm size, as is sometimes suggested in extant literature. We also find that it is the size of the import transaction rather than the size of the preference margin that determines preference utilization.

Suggested Citation

  • Kasteng, Jonas & Kokko, Ari & Tingvall, Patrik, 2022. "Who Uses the EU's Free Trade Agreements? A Transaction-Level Analysis of the EU–South Korea FTA," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 21(1), pages 93-108, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:wotrrv:v:21:y:2022:i:1:p:93-108_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1474745621000355/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:wotrrv:v:21:y:2022:i:1:p:93-108_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/wtr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.