IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/utilit/v38y2026i2p102-118_2.html

How Relationships Mitigate Paternalistic Complaints (When They Do)

Author

Listed:
  • Munch, Lauritz Aastrup
  • Midtgaard, Søren Flinch

Abstract

Many believe that relationships can make a constitutive difference to the moral status of paternalistic treatment. For example, it is often assumed that it’s easier to justify paternalizing a spouse than a stranger. But although this thought is widespread, there exists no detailed account of how relationships could mitigate paternalistic complaints. The aim of this paper is to develop an account of this phenomenon, drawing on the work of Margaret Gilbert and the notion of joint commitments. According to the resulting view, close relations can constitutively mitigate paternalistic complaints by rendering paternalistic interference consistent with the will of the paternalized agent.

Suggested Citation

  • Munch, Lauritz Aastrup & Midtgaard, Søren Flinch, 2026. "How Relationships Mitigate Paternalistic Complaints (When They Do)," Utilitas, Cambridge University Press, vol. 38(2), pages 102-118, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:utilit:v:38:y:2026:i:2:p:102-118_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0953820826100235/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:utilit:v:38:y:2026:i:2:p:102-118_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/uti .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.