IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/reveco/v43y2025i2p279-308_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Secular stagnation? A new view on Brazil’s growth in the 19th century

Author

Listed:
  • Bacha, Edmar Lisboa
  • Tombolo, Guilherme A.
  • Versiani, Flávio Rabelo

Abstract

The established economic historiography asserts that Brazil’s per-capita GDP stagnated in the 19th century and that it grew extremely slowly in the period of the monarchy (1822–1889). We argue that these conclusions are based on inadequate methods, insufficient statistical evidence, and disregard for available historical evidence. Building on the methodology followed by one of us in a previous article, with the use of new databases, and a reasoned exploration of alternatives, our best estimate is that over the 1820–1900 period, Brazil’s per-capita income grew at a trend rate of 0.9% per year, a performance like Western Europe and other Latin America countries. Only a sharp economic contraction at the end of the period dulled Brazil’s performance in the 19th century.

Suggested Citation

  • Bacha, Edmar Lisboa & Tombolo, Guilherme A. & Versiani, Flávio Rabelo, 2025. "Secular stagnation? A new view on Brazil’s growth in the 19th century," Revista de Historia Económica / Journal of Iberian and Latin American Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 43(2), pages 279-308, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:reveco:v:43:y:2025:i:2:p:279-308_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S021261092510058X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:reveco:v:43:y:2025:i:2:p:279-308_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/rhe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.