IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/rdepol/v7y2002i02p109-119_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Expected utility and the cumulative consequences of repeated decisions: a tutorial

Author

Listed:
  • DOUBLEDAY, W.G.

Abstract

Utility theory as developed by Von Neuman and Morgenstern provides an elegant way to make consistent choices among risky alternatives by maximizing the expected value of a personal utility function over known probability distributions of outcomes. The theory is usually presented in the context of a single (possibly complex) decision, where it gives little guidance on the choice of a utility function. This paper provides a tutorial on the consequences of applying expected utility theory to repeated decisions, using theory and simulation to reveal the statistical regularity arising cumulatively from repeatedly applying the same utility. If decisions are repeated and consequences accumulate, two utility functions stand out as maximizing cumulative incremental growth and cumulative compound growth, namely the linear utility and the logarithmic utility, respectively. Repeatedly basing decisions on the linear utility when compound growth applies and severe losses are possible can be disastrous in the long term. Relevance to financial investment and population catastrophes is considered.

Suggested Citation

  • Doubleday, W.G., 2002. "Expected utility and the cumulative consequences of repeated decisions: a tutorial," Risk, Decision and Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 7(2), pages 109-119, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:rdepol:v:7:y:2002:i:02:p:109-119_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1357530902000546/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:rdepol:v:7:y:2002:i:02:p:109-119_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/rdp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.