IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/polals/v33y2025i2p107-121_3.html

Improving Computer Vision Interpretability: Transparent Two-Level Classification for Complex Scenes

Author

Listed:
  • Scholz, Stefan
  • Weidmann, Nils B.
  • Steinert-Threlkeld, Zachary C.
  • Keremoğlu, Eda
  • Goldlücke, Bastian

Abstract

Treating images as data has become increasingly popular in political science. While existing classifiers for images reach high levels of accuracy, it is difficult to systematically assess the visual features on which they base their classification. This paper presents a two-level classification method that addresses this transparency problem. At the first stage, an image segmenter detects the objects present in the image and a feature vector is created from those objects. In the second stage, this feature vector is used as input for standard machine learning classifiers to discriminate between images. We apply this method to a new dataset of more than 140,000 images to detect which ones display political protest. This analysis demonstrates three advantages to this paper’s approach. First, identifying objects in images improves transparency by providing human-understandable labels for the objects shown on an image. Second, knowing these objects enables analysis of which distinguish protest images from non-protest ones. Third, comparing the importance of objects across countries reveals how protest behavior varies. These insights are not available using conventional computer vision classifiers and provide new opportunities for comparative research.

Suggested Citation

  • Scholz, Stefan & Weidmann, Nils B. & Steinert-Threlkeld, Zachary C. & Keremoğlu, Eda & Goldlücke, Bastian, 2025. "Improving Computer Vision Interpretability: Transparent Two-Level Classification for Complex Scenes," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 33(2), pages 107-121, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:polals:v:33:y:2025:i:2:p:107-121_3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1047198724000184/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:polals:v:33:y:2025:i:2:p:107-121_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/pan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.