IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/polals/v32y2024i3p295-310_1.html

A Partisan Solution to Partisan Gerrymandering: The Define–Combine Procedure

Author

Listed:
  • Palmer, Maxwell
  • Schneer, Benjamin
  • DeLuca, Kevin

Abstract

Redistricting reformers have proposed many solutions to the problem of partisan gerrymandering, but they all require either bipartisan consensus or the agreement of both parties on the legitimacy of a neutral third party to resolve disputes. In this paper, we propose a new method for drawing district maps, the Define–Combine Procedure, that substantially reduces partisan gerrymandering without requiring a neutral third party or bipartisan agreement. One party defines a map of $2N$ equal-population contiguous districts. Then the second party combines pairs of contiguous districts to create the final map of N districts. Using real-world geographic and electoral data, we employ simulations and map-drawing algorithms to show that this procedure dramatically reduces the advantage conferred to the party controlling the redistricting process and leads to less-biased maps without requiring cooperation or non-partisan actors.

Suggested Citation

  • Palmer, Maxwell & Schneer, Benjamin & DeLuca, Kevin, 2024. "A Partisan Solution to Partisan Gerrymandering: The Define–Combine Procedure," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 32(3), pages 295-310, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:polals:v:32:y:2024:i:3:p:295-310_1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1047198723000396/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:polals:v:32:y:2024:i:3:p:295-310_1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/pan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.