IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/polals/v26y2018i04p457-473_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ideological Scaling of Social Media Users: AÂ Dynamic Lexicon Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Temporão, Mickael
  • Vande Kerckhove, Corentin
  • van der Linden, Clifton
  • Dufresne, Yannick
  • Hendrickx, Julien M.

Abstract

Words matter in politics. The rhetoric that political elites employ structures civic discourse. The emergence of social media platforms as a medium of politics has enabled ordinary citizens to express their ideological inclinations by adopting the lexicon of political elites. This avails to researchers a rich new source of data in the study of political ideology. However, existing ideological text-scaling methods fail to produce meaningful inferences when applied to the short, informal style of textual content that is characteristic of social media platforms such as Twitter. This paper introduces the first viable approach to the estimation of individual-level ideological positions derived from social media content. This method allows us to position social media users—be they political elites, parties, or citizens—along a shared ideological dimension. We validate the proposed method by demonstrating correlation with existing measures of ideology across various political contexts and multiple languages. We further demonstrate the ability of ideological estimates to capture derivative signal by predicting out-of-sample, individual-level voting intentions. We posit that social media data can, when properly modeled, better capture derivative signal than discrete scales used in more traditional survey instruments.

Suggested Citation

  • Temporão, Mickael & Vande Kerckhove, Corentin & van der Linden, Clifton & Dufresne, Yannick & Hendrickx, Julien M., 2018. "Ideological Scaling of Social Media Users: A Dynamic Lexicon Approach," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 26(4), pages 457-473, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:polals:v:26:y:2018:i:04:p:457-473_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S104719871800030X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:polals:v:26:y:2018:i:04:p:457-473_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/pan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.