IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/polals/v25y2017i02p207-222_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Clause Analysis: Using Syntactic Information to Automatically Extract Source, Subject, and Predicate from Texts with an Application to the 2008–2009 Gaza War

Author

Listed:
  • van Atteveldt, Wouter
  • Sheafer, Tamir
  • Shenhav, Shaul R.
  • Fogel-Dror, Yair

Abstract

This article presents a new method and open source R package that uses syntactic information to automatically extract source–subject–predicate clauses. This improves on frequency-based text analysis methods by dividing text into predicates with an identified subject and optional source, extracting the statements and actions of (political) actors as mentioned in the text. The content of these predicates can be analyzed using existing frequency-based methods, allowing for the analysis of actions, issue positions and framing by different actors within a single text. We show that a small set of syntactic patterns can extract clauses and identify quotes with good accuracy, significantly outperforming a baseline system based on word order. Taking the 2008–2009 Gaza war as an example, we further show how corpus comparison and semantic network analysis applied to the results of the clause analysis can show differences in citation and framing patterns between U.S. and English-language Chinese coverage of this war.

Suggested Citation

  • van Atteveldt, Wouter & Sheafer, Tamir & Shenhav, Shaul R. & Fogel-Dror, Yair, 2017. "Clause Analysis: Using Syntactic Information to Automatically Extract Source, Subject, and Predicate from Texts with an Application to the 2008–2009 Gaza War," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 25(2), pages 207-222, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:polals:v:25:y:2017:i:02:p:207-222_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1047198716000127/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sandra Wankmüller, 2023. "A comparison of approaches for imbalanced classification problems in the context of retrieving relevant documents for an analysis," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 91-163, April.
    2. Oscar Stuhler, 2022. "Who Does What to Whom? Making Text Parsers Work for Sociological Inquiry," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 51(4), pages 1580-1633, November.
    3. Jan Kleinnijenhuis, 2018. "News, Ads, Chats, and Property Rights over Algorithms," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(3), pages 77-82.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:polals:v:25:y:2017:i:02:p:207-222_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/pan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.