IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/polals/v18y2010i01p78-102_01.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of Misclassifications in Probit Models: Monte Carlo Simulations and Applications

Author

Listed:
  • Hug, Simon

Abstract

The increased use of models with limited-dependent variables has allowed researchers to test important relationships in political science. Often, however, researchers employing such models fail to acknowledge that the violation of some basic assumptions has in part difference consequences in nonlinear models than in linear ones. In this paper, I demonstrate this for binary probit models in which the dependent variable is systematically miscoded. Contrary to the linear model, such misclassifications affect not only the estimate of the intercept but also those of the other coefficients. In a Monte Carlo simulation, I demonstrate that a model proposed by Hausman, Abrevaya, and Scott-Morton (1998, Misclassification of the dependent variable in a discrete-response setting. Journal of Econometrics 87:239–69) allows for correcting these biases in binary probit models. Empirical examples based on reanalyses of models explaining the occurrence of rebellions and civil wars demonstrate the problem that comes from neglecting these misclassifications.

Suggested Citation

  • Hug, Simon, 2010. "The Effect of Misclassifications in Probit Models: Monte Carlo Simulations and Applications," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(1), pages 78-102, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:polals:v:18:y:2010:i:01:p:78-102_01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1047198700012328/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jóhanna K. Birnir & David D. Laitin & Jonathan Wilkenfeld & David M. Waguespack & Agatha S. Hultquist & Ted R. Gurr, 2018. "Introducing the AMAR (All Minorities at Risk) Data," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 62(1), pages 203-226, January.
    2. Kerstin Bruckmeier & Regina T. Riphahn & Jürgen Wiemers, 2021. "Misreporting of program take-up in survey data and its consequences for measuring non-take-up: new evidence from linked administrative and survey data," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 61(3), pages 1567-1616, September.
    3. Maria Felice Arezzo & Giuseppina Guagnano, 2019. "Misclassification in Binary Choice Models with Sample Selection," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-19, July.
    4. Aller, Carlos & González Chapela, Jorge, 2013. "Misclassification of the dependent variable in a debt–repayment behavior context," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 162-172.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:polals:v:18:y:2010:i:01:p:78-102_01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/pan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.