Author
Abstract
The 2025 Budget exemplified the dysfunction in the UK’s Budget process, with systematic and selective briefing of underlying forecast details—meant to be private between the Office for Budget Responsibility and the Treasury—to the media since the 2022 ‘mini-budget’ crisis. In all documented occasions, this has come from the Treasury, with the OBR remaining silent allowing the Treasury to bed in a narrative based on partial information, with real costs in terms of prolonged uncertainty and market volatility. This article proposes a relatively narrow reform to the process that would see the OBR ‘bookend’ the Budget. The OBR would publish its pre-measures forecast three weeks before a fiscal statement—the same timing as it currently delivers it internally to the Treasury. The Treasury would then respond with its policy measures on Budget Day, with an OBR assessment following some days or a couple of weeks later. Key benefits of this reform are: increased transparency and democratic accountability; removing the OBR from politically contentious judgements about second-round effects of policies before they are announced and under pressure from the Treasury to hit particular fiscal rule targets; reducing the window for market uncertainty by providing a published baseline; and restricting speculation after OBR publication to policy decisions. This would be achieved while minimising the impact on the established forecast timetable. This design, adopting established practice from the Netherlands in publishing the pre-measures forecast to the UK’s institutional setup, can help guard the OBR’s independence while reducing the window for market volatility.
Suggested Citation
Sousa, João P., 2025.
"Bookending The Budget: A Proposal For Reforming The Uk Fiscal Policy Process,"
National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 273, pages -6, August.
Handle:
RePEc:cup:nierev:v:273:y:2025:i::p:_6
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:nierev:v:273:y:2025:i::p:_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/niesruk.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.