IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/macdyn/v30y2026ipe50_50.html

Inefficient unemployment and bargaining friction

Author

Listed:
  • Yuen, C. Y. Kelvin

Abstract

This paper examines how bargaining frictions generate privately inefficient job separations and amplify unemployment fluctuations. I propose a simple specification of bargaining friction by including bargaining wedges in the standard Nash bargaining model. Such bargaining wedges arise when, for example, wages are determined by alternating-offers bargaining, which is often used in the literature to generate real wage rigidity, or when there is asymmetric information about worker’s productivity. I show that due to the misalignment between actual surpluses and bargaining surpluses, inefficient separations could be generated, which would in turn induce inefficient unemployment. I highlight a distinct amplification mechanism that operates through the separation margin. The existence of inefficient unemployment due to bargaining friction could accentuate the fluctuation of unemployment. Quantitatively, I find that inefficient unemployment accounts for up to 30% of the total unemployment volatility in the calibrated model.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuen, C. Y. Kelvin, 2026. "Inefficient unemployment and bargaining friction," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 30, pages 1-50, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:macdyn:v:30:y:2026:i::p:e50_50
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1365100526101242/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:macdyn:v:30:y:2026:i::p:e50_50. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/mdy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.