IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/macdyn/v18y2014i08p1751-1772_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Transaction Costs, Nonfundamental Uncertainty, And The Exchange Rate Disconnect

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Nan

Abstract

Exchange rates display excessive volatility and are disconnected from macroeconomic fundamentals. This paper presents a two-country general equilibrium model in which nonfundamental uncertainty (“sunspots”) in part drives stochastic fluctuations in the exchange rate in a class of rational expectation equilibria. In the model, a combination of financial frictions—incomplete asset markets and a proportional transaction cost associated with trading foreign-currency-denominated bonds—breaks the tight link between exchange rates and fundamentals. Moreover, the model generates a negative Backus–Smith correlation between relative consumption and the real exchange rate, because relative prices, acting as a source of shocks as opposed to shock absorbers, directly affect relative output and generate a large wealth effect on relative consumption. Using a random walk as an example of sunspot shocks, the volatility of exchange rates relative to that of output and consumption is found to be large in the presence of nontradable goods and distribution services.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Nan, 2014. "Transaction Costs, Nonfundamental Uncertainty, And The Exchange Rate Disconnect," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(8), pages 1751-1772, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:macdyn:v:18:y:2014:i:08:p:1751-1772_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1365100513000151/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mauro Bambi & Sara Eugeni, 2021. "Nominal exchange rate determination and dynamics in an OLG framework," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 72(1), pages 93-132, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:macdyn:v:18:y:2014:i:08:p:1751-1772_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/mdy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.