IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jpenef/v25y2026i2p195-216_4.html

Household savings and shocks to occupational pension funds

Author

Listed:
  • Caloia, Francesco
  • Mastrogiacomo, Mauro
  • Simonetti, Irene

Abstract

Using household survey data linked to supervisory data of Dutch pension funds, we provide evidence of the increase in household savings caused by shocks to the financial position of pension funds. Our identification strategy exploits cross-sectional and time variations in pension funds’ funding ratios, which result from asset allocations and price corrections outside the control of fund members. The findings reveal that fluctuations in funding ratios significantly impact household savings, with a displacement effect above 40 percent. Lower funding ratios are associated with higher voluntary savings, driven primarily by members of pension funds with lower historical returns. Unlike earlier studies, this paper covers a long time span including three major economic crises, providing novel insights into the interaction between pension fund stability and individual saving behaviour.

Suggested Citation

  • Caloia, Francesco & Mastrogiacomo, Mauro & Simonetti, Irene, 2026. "Household savings and shocks to occupational pension funds," Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, Cambridge University Press, vol. 25(2), pages 195-216, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jpenef:v:25:y:2026:i:2:p:195-216_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1474747225000034/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jpenef:v:25:y:2026:i:2:p:195-216_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/pef .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.