IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jpenef/v24y2025i2p235-255_2.html

The actuarial sources of the rise in unfunded liabilities in America's defined benefit plans in the 21st century

Author

Listed:
  • Fuchsman, Dillon
  • Hengerer, David
  • Moody, Jonathan
  • Randazzo, Anthony

Abstract

Despite a decade-long bull market between the financial crisis and the COVID-19 recession, state defined benefit pension plans had accrued more than $1.37 trillion in unfunded liabilities. However, little work has investigated the actuarial sources of these unfunded liabilities. This paper uses original data hand collected from publicly available financial reports between 2000 and 2020 for 145 state-administered pension plans to determine the sources of unfunded liabilities. The largest unfunded liability contributor is investment experiences (when actual investment returns do not match assumed returns). The second and third largest contributors are changes to actuarial assumptions and expected changes (or interest accruing on existing unfunded liabilities). Benefit experience and legislative changes, demographic experience, and explicit funding shortfalls account for relatively little of the growth in unfunded liabilities. Moreover, the specific sources of unfunded liabilities are heterogeneous over time and across plans.

Suggested Citation

  • Fuchsman, Dillon & Hengerer, David & Moody, Jonathan & Randazzo, Anthony, 2025. "The actuarial sources of the rise in unfunded liabilities in America's defined benefit plans in the 21st century," Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(2), pages 235-255, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jpenef:v:24:y:2025:i:2:p:235-255_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1474747224000064/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jpenef:v:24:y:2025:i:2:p:235-255_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/pef .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.