IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jpenef/v24y2025i1p95-122_6.html

Measuring income of the aged in household surveys: evidence from linked administrative records

Author

Listed:
  • Dushi, Irena
  • Trenkamp, Brad
  • Bee, Charles Adam
  • Mitchell, Joshua W.

Abstract

Household survey estimates of retirement income suffer from substantial underreporting which biases downward measures of elderly financial well-being. Using data from both the 2016 Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement (CPS ASEC) and the Health and Retirement Study (HRS), matched with administrative records, we examine to what extent underreporting of retirement income affects key statistics: elderly reliance on social security benefits and poverty. We find that retirement income is underreported in both the CPS ASEC and the HRS. Consequently, the relative importance of social security income remains overstated – 53 percent of elderly beneficiaries in the CPS ASEC and 49 percent in the HRS rely on social security for the majority of their incomes compared to 42 percent in the administrative data. The elderly poverty rate is also overstated – 8.8 percent in the CPS ASEC and 7.4 percent in the HRS compared to 6.4 percent in the administrative data.

Suggested Citation

  • Dushi, Irena & Trenkamp, Brad & Bee, Charles Adam & Mitchell, Joshua W., 2025. "Measuring income of the aged in household surveys: evidence from linked administrative records," Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(1), pages 95-122, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jpenef:v:24:y:2025:i:1:p:95-122_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1474747224000039/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jpenef:v:24:y:2025:i:1:p:95-122_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/pef .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.