IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jpenef/v21y2022i2p260-293_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Redistribution in collective pension arrangements without a sponsor guarantee: Hidden versus explicit risk transactions

Author

Listed:
  • Yi, Lu
  • Sanders, Barbara
  • Bégin, Jean-François

Abstract

In collective pension arrangements without a sponsor guarantee, assets and liabilities are commingled, and members' benefits are adjusted to reflect emerging plan experience. Stakeholders pay attention to the fairness of the intergenerational transactions arising from the inclusion of certain design elements; however, implicit intergenerational transactions exist even in pure collective defined contribution (CDC) arrangements without any such explicit stabilization mechanisms. In this study, we find that the implicit risk transactions are uneven: significant value transfers among cohorts can result from joining a pure CDC plan. We then compare these to the additional value transfers arising from explicit stabilization mechanisms.

Suggested Citation

  • Yi, Lu & Sanders, Barbara & Bégin, Jean-François, 2022. "Redistribution in collective pension arrangements without a sponsor guarantee: Hidden versus explicit risk transactions," Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, Cambridge University Press, vol. 21(2), pages 260-293, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jpenef:v:21:y:2022:i:2:p:260-293_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1474747220000293/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jpenef:v:21:y:2022:i:2:p:260-293_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/pef .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.