IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jpenef/v20y2021i4p454-467_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating alternative approaches for predicting pension benefits and incentives

Author

Listed:
  • Knapp, David
  • Lis, Maciej
  • Lee, Jinkook
  • Phillips, Drystan

Abstract

In an effort to promote comparative research on pensions, the Gateway to Global Aging Data is developing harmonized cross-national panel data on pension benefits and retirement incentives. Past research has varied in how it predicts pension benefits for individuals who have not yet claimed their benefits when administrative data on earnings histories is unavailable. We use the Gateway data to evaluate several alternative approaches to computing prospective pension benefits using common survey questions and validate them against matched administrative data. We find that in some settings naïve measures of pension benefit growth from continued work and delayed benefit claiming can perform as well as measures based on administrative data. We also find that prospective benefit levels are sensitive to the heterogeneity of lifecycle earnings dynamics, resulting in substantial measurement error even after accounting for work history.

Suggested Citation

  • Knapp, David & Lis, Maciej & Lee, Jinkook & Phillips, Drystan, 2021. "Evaluating alternative approaches for predicting pension benefits and incentives," Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(4), pages 454-467, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jpenef:v:20:y:2021:i:4:p:454-467_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1474747219000027/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jpenef:v:20:y:2021:i:4:p:454-467_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/pef .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.