IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jpenef/v18y2019i03p473-493_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Robust hedging in incomplete markets

Author

Listed:
  • SHEN, SALLY
  • PELSSER, ANTOON
  • SCHOTMAN, PETER

Abstract

We considered a pension fund that needs to hedge uncertain long-term liabilities. We modeled the pension fund as a robust investor facing an incomplete market and fearing model uncertainty for the evolution of its liabilities. The robust agent is assumed to minimize the shortfall between the assets and liabilities under an endogenous worst-case scenario by means of solving a min–max robust optimization problem. When the funding ratio is low, robustness reduces the demand for risky assets. However, cherishing the hope of covering the liabilities, a substantial risk exposure is still optimal. A longer investment horizon or a higher funding ratio weakens the investor's fear of model misspecification. If the expected equity return is overestimated, the initial capital requirement for hedging can be decreased by following the robust strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Shen, Sally & Pelsser, Antoon & Schotman, Peter, 2019. "Robust hedging in incomplete markets," Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(3), pages 473-493, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jpenef:v:18:y:2019:i:03:p:473-493_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1474747218000069/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jpenef:v:18:y:2019:i:03:p:473-493_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/pef .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.