IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jpenef/v14y2015i03p266-292_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Discretion in the accounting for defined benefit obligations – an empirical analysis of German IFRS statements

Author

Listed:
  • SALEWSKI, MARCUS
  • ZÜLCH, HENNING

Abstract

Following the research approach of Hann et al. (2007), this study investigates how discretion in the determination of the defined benefit obligation (DBO) is perceived by investors using a sample of listed German companies in the period of 2005–2011. For this, actuarial assumptions – discount interest rates, compensation growth rate and projected future pension increases – are replaced by their respective industry medians to obtain that component of the DBO, which can be attributed to discretion. We find that the discretionary component is not value relevant in overall terms, which is in contrast to prior research. We provide an explanation in the country-specific characteristics of Germany. Furthermore, we find weak evidence that the discretionary component is incorporated in investor's equity valuations when pension plans are distinctly underfunded.

Suggested Citation

  • Salewski, Marcus & Zülch, Henning, 2015. "Discretion in the accounting for defined benefit obligations – an empirical analysis of German IFRS statements," Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(3), pages 266-292, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jpenef:v:14:y:2015:i:03:p:266-292_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1474747214000249/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jude Edeigba & Christopher Gan & Felix Amenkhienan, 2020. "The influence of cultural diversity on the convergence of IFRS: evidence from Nigeria IFRS implementation," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 55(1), pages 105-121, July.
    2. Melik Ertugrul & Volkan Demir, 2018. "How Does Unobserved Heterogeneity Affect Value Relevance?," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 28(2), pages 288-301, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jpenef:v:14:y:2015:i:03:p:266-292_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/pef .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.