IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jhisec/v42y2020i3p401-416_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding Clarence Ayres’S Criticism Of An Emerging Mainstream And Birthing Institutionalism Through The 1930s Ayres-Knight Debate

Author

Listed:
  • Almeida, Felipe
  • Cavalieri, Marco

Abstract

Clarence Ayres was a strong dissenting voice in US economics during the twentieth century. In the 1930s, a debate between Ayres and Frank Knight was published by the International Journal of Ethics. Although the debate focused on ethics, the evolution of economics was also discussed. This paper proposes an understanding of Ayres’s ideas based on the context in which he made them. This context is defined by the 1930s Ayres-Knight debate and the archival correspondence between Ayres and Knight during the 1930s.

Suggested Citation

  • Almeida, Felipe & Cavalieri, Marco, 2020. "Understanding Clarence Ayres’S Criticism Of An Emerging Mainstream And Birthing Institutionalism Through The 1930s Ayres-Knight Debate," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 42(3), pages 401-416, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jhisec:v:42:y:2020:i:3:p:401-416_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1053837219000336/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jhisec:v:42:y:2020:i:3:p:401-416_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/het .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.