IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jhisec/v39y2017i02p273-279_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On The Concept Of Economia Civile And €Œfelicitas Publica†: A Comment On Federico D’Onofrio

Author

Listed:
  • Bruni, Luigino

Abstract

In “On the Concept of ‘Felicitas Publica’ in Eighteenth-Century Political Economy,†a recent paper in this journal, Federico D’Onofrio strongly criticizes the interpretation that Luigino Bruni and Stefano Zamagni have offered of the eighteenth-century Neapolitan tradition of civil economy and public happiness, as articulated by Antonio Genovesi. D’Onofrio claims that Bruni and colleagues have not fully explored the political meaning of public happiness within eighteenth-century economics, and that Bruni unfairly criticized methodological individualism on the basis of the intrinsically social character of happiness. This paper is a reply to D’Onofrio.

Suggested Citation

  • Bruni, Luigino, 2017. "On The Concept Of Economia Civile And €Œfelicitas Publica†: A Comment On Federico D’Onofrio," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 39(2), pages 273-279, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jhisec:v:39:y:2017:i:02:p:273-279_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1053837216000237/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Paolo Santori, 2019. "The foundation of the right of property: Rosmini as Genovesi’s interpreter," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 66(4), pages 353-367, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jhisec:v:39:y:2017:i:02:p:273-279_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/het .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.