IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jhisec/v37y2015i04p583-596_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Wieser’S Unity Of Thought

Author

Listed:
  • Tokumaru, Natsuka

Abstract

In his attempt to improve Carl Menger’s economics, Friedrich von Wieser frequently discussed methodological issues. This paper proposes that Wieser’s epistemological position can be understood as the result of a reformulation of the empirical position that Menger (1871) developed in his Grundsätze der Volkswirthschaftslehre. This paper proposes four ways of interpreting Wieser’s concept of “experience†: i) experience stored in language, ii) experience as introspection, iii) experience as a mental experiment, and iv) experience as observation. Because Wieser applied the concept of “motivational power†derived from psychological induction in order to explain observable social phenomena, this paper calls his position “methodological motivationalism.†This particular position can help explain his later shift to sociological studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Tokumaru, Natsuka, 2015. "Wieser’S Unity Of Thought," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 37(4), pages 583-596, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jhisec:v:37:y:2015:i:04:p:583-596_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1053837215000486/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jhisec:v:37:y:2015:i:04:p:583-596_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/het .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.