IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jhisec/v37y2015i01p1-15_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

2014 Hes Presidential Address Bees And Silkworms: Mandeville, Hume, And The Framing Of Political Economy

Author

Listed:
  • Schabas, Margaret

Abstract

Mandeville and Hume advance similar framings for their political economy, using emergentist and proto-sociological lines of analysis. They are less aligned with liberalism (political, economic, or metaphysical) than mercantilism, insofar as they favor balance-of-trade arguments and urbanization. They are both methodological holists, not individualists. It is the group, not individual agents, that figures at the core of their thought.

Suggested Citation

  • Schabas, Margaret, 2015. "2014 Hes Presidential Address Bees And Silkworms: Mandeville, Hume, And The Framing Of Political Economy," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 37(1), pages 1-15, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jhisec:v:37:y:2015:i:01:p:1-15_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1053837214000716/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marcuzzo, Maria Cristina & Zacchia, Giulia, 2024. "The History Of Economic Thought From The Viewpoint Of Hes Presidential Addresses," SocArXiv wt9rp, Center for Open Science.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jhisec:v:37:y:2015:i:01:p:1-15_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/het .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.