IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jhisec/v35y2013i01p93-111_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Marxian Wage Theory Against The €Œabsolute Immizeration†Doctrine

Author

Listed:
  • BARONIAN, LAURENT

Abstract

This paper provides a refutation of the “absolute immizeration†doctrine that S. Hollander attributes to Marx, by emphasizing the Marxian original categories and laws of capitalist production in order to base Marx’s opposition to this doctrine on his more profound opposition to Classics about the law of supply and demand for labor.The paper proceeds as follows: first, it is shown that the Marxian subsistence wage does not exclude population growth. Second, the analysis of surplus population will reveal how it is not only a condition of the business cycle, but also one of its immediate results. In this sense, the so-called theory of dual labor force, which Hollander uses to discard the role of surplus population in the decreasing real-wage trend, proves a misunderstanding of the origin and nature of the industrial reserve army.From the labor demand side, on the other hand, the endogeneity of technical progress precludes any “ongoing process†of increasing organic composition of capital. Finally, it will appear that categories of labor power, wages defined as the value of labor power, or laws such as decreasing necessary labor and increasing surplus labor, allow Marx to develop a law of supply and demand for labor partly unrelated to the number of workers and the evolution of population growth, which necessarily rules out any birth-rate control policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Baronian, Laurent, 2013. "The Marxian Wage Theory Against The €Œabsolute Immizeration†Doctrine," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 35(1), pages 93-111, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jhisec:v:35:y:2013:i:01:p:93-111_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S105383721200065X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jhisec:v:35:y:2013:i:01:p:93-111_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/het .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.