IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jhisec/v32y2010i03p349-376_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Before Development Economics: Western Political Economy, The “Russian Case,” And The First Perceptions Of Economic Backwardness (From The 1760s Until The Mid-Nineteenth Century)

Author

Listed:
  • ADAMOVSKY, EZEQUIEL

Abstract

Before the emergence of the field of development economics in the mid-1940s, the mainstream of Western economists had very little to say about the world outside western Europe. However, perhaps due to Russia’s ambivalent location as a nation considered not fully European (nor completely Asiatic) and to her status as a major player in the international arena despite the fact of her modest economic achievements, from the eighteenth century onwards the “Russian case” called the attention of some of the most prominent Western minds, including the first economists. By discussing Russia’s economy, they came to notions and concepts regarding development and backwardness that, to a great extent. informed the twentieth-century debate. The aim of this article is to explore the way in which Russia as a case study affected the evolution of ideas on economic growth or development. The evidence of things Russian, it will be argued, raised doubts about common economic views, thus enabling new thinking that pointed either to criticism of liberal orthodoxy, or to expansion and refinement of its arguments.

Suggested Citation

  • Adamovsky, Ezequiel, 2010. "Before Development Economics: Western Political Economy, The “Russian Case,” And The First Perceptions Of Economic Backwardness (From The 1760s Until The Mid-Nineteenth Century)," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 32(03), pages 349-376, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jhisec:v:32:y:2010:i:03:p:349-376_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S1053837210000313
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jhisec:v:32:y:2010:i:03:p:349-376_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Keith Waters). General contact details of provider: http://journals.cambridge.org/jid_HET .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.