IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jglhis/v21y2026i2p421-443_11.html

Unpacking the Emergency Health Kit of international humanitarian medical aid, 1978–90: How humanitarian standards and supply chains became global

Author

Listed:
  • Cullen, Maria
  • Taithe, Bertrand
  • Winters, Janelle

Abstract

This article considers the history of Emergency Health Kits established by United Nations agencies and the larger medical non-governmental organizations of the 1980s to analyse the significance of standardized responses in humanitarian emergencies. We argue that, far from being a rigid and immutable response, the kits reflected a (not universally realized) desire to standardize and control both supplies and medical care from international organizations. As such, humanitarian medical practice remained a disputed field in which each object or drug was negotiated at the risk of creating innovation traps. Coming at a time of increasingly global logistics capacities, the Emergency Health Kits became a central feature of a more coordinated global marketplace of humanitarian aid. The kits’ promise to provide rapid transport of emergency supplies to crisis settings across the world was often experienced as a construct, with long delays and logjams in certain regions. Even so, humanitarian organizations were agents of globalization because they imagined a system of centralized production in the Global North and supply to isolated and/or insecure locations across the world.

Suggested Citation

  • Cullen, Maria & Taithe, Bertrand & Winters, Janelle, 2026. "Unpacking the Emergency Health Kit of international humanitarian medical aid, 1978–90: How humanitarian standards and supply chains became global," Journal of Global History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 21(2), pages 421-443, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jglhis:v:21:y:2026:i:2:p:421-443_11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1740022825100223/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jglhis:v:21:y:2026:i:2:p:421-443_11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jgh .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.