IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jfinqa/v60y2025i7p3154-3194_3.html

The Employee Clientele of Corporate Leverage: Evidence from Family Labor Income Diversification

Author

Listed:
  • He, Jie (Jack)
  • Ren, Xiao (Shaun)
  • Shu, Tao
  • Yang, Huan

Abstract

Consistent with theories on the equilibrium matching between capital structure and employee job risk aversion, we find a robust, positive association between a firm’s leverage and its employees’ family labor income diversification. Higher-Leverage firms also recruit new employees with greater income diversification. For identification, we exploit two policy shocks that exogenously change employee income diversification and firm leverage, respectively. Individual employee-level tests further reveal that workers with differential risk attitudes adjust their job choices and household labor income portfolios in response to significant shifts in their employers’ leverage. Finally, human bankruptcy costs contribute to the general level of corporate risk-taking.

Suggested Citation

  • He, Jie (Jack) & Ren, Xiao (Shaun) & Shu, Tao & Yang, Huan, 2025. "The Employee Clientele of Corporate Leverage: Evidence from Family Labor Income Diversification," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 60(7), pages 3154-3194, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:60:y:2025:i:7:p:3154-3194_3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022109025000031/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:60:y:2025:i:7:p:3154-3194_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jfq .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.