IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jfinqa/v60y2025i3p1185-1233_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Book-to-Market, Mispricing, and the Cross Section of Corporate Bond Returns

Author

Listed:
  • Bartram, Söhnke M.
  • Grinblatt, Mark
  • Nozawa, Yoshio

Abstract

Corporate bonds’ book-to-market ratios predict returns computed from transaction prices. Senior bonds (even investment grade) with the 20% highest ratios outperform the 20% lowest by 3%–4% annually after non-parametrically controlling for numerous liquidity, default, microstructure, and priced-risk attributes: yield-to-maturity, bid–ask spread, duration/maturity, credit spread/rating, past returns, coupon, size, age, industry, and structural model equity hedges. Spreads for all-bond samples are larger. An efficient bond market would not exhibit the observed decay in the ratio’s predictive efficacy with implementation delays, small yield-to-maturity spreads, or similar-sized spreads across bonds with differing risks. A methodological innovation avoids liquidity filters and censorship that bias returns.

Suggested Citation

  • Bartram, Söhnke M. & Grinblatt, Mark & Nozawa, Yoshio, 2025. "Book-to-Market, Mispricing, and the Cross Section of Corporate Bond Returns," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 60(3), pages 1185-1233, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:60:y:2025:i:3:p:1185-1233_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022109024000048/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:60:y:2025:i:3:p:1185-1233_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jfq .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.