IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jfinqa/v60y2025i3p1111-1145_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Paying Managers of Complex Portfolios: Evidence on Compensation and Performance from Endowments

Author

Listed:
  • Binfarè, Matteo
  • Harris, Robert S.

Abstract

We examine compensation for endowment Chief Investment Officers (CIOs) overseeing portfolios with significant allocations to alternatives. We find widespread use of bonuses and that large endowments with high alternative allocations hire CIOs with stronger backgrounds, pay them more, and have higher pay-for-performance sensitivity. We find weak evidence of a relationship between compensation and future performance. Our results align with contract theory predictions but differ from empirical findings on pension funds. Endowments pay CIOs more, rely more on bonuses, attract more experienced professionals, and have lower turnover than pensions. This suggests more effective talent management compared to politically influenced public pensions.

Suggested Citation

  • Binfarè, Matteo & Harris, Robert S., 2025. "Paying Managers of Complex Portfolios: Evidence on Compensation and Performance from Endowments," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 60(3), pages 1111-1145, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:60:y:2025:i:3:p:1111-1145_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022109024000188/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:60:y:2025:i:3:p:1111-1145_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jfq .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.