IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jfinqa/v22y1987i04p505-511_01.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Relevance of the Distributional Form of Common Stock Returns to the Construction of Optimal Portfolios

Author

Listed:
  • Frankfurter, George M.
  • Lamoureux, Christopher G.

Abstract

In this paper, we compare the robustness in application of the Gaussian assumption of security return distributions to the robustness of the general stable assumption. Using actual stock return data to simulate the “real world,†a stock market is constructed in which stock returns conform to a Gaussian distribution as well as to a stable Pareto-Levy distribution. Using these two sets of stock returns, efficient frontiers are generated under both assumptions of parametric environments. It is shown that the Gaussian assumption, and its incumbent statistical techniques, is preferable to the general stable assumption.

Suggested Citation

  • Frankfurter, George M. & Lamoureux, Christopher G., 1987. "The Relevance of the Distributional Form of Common Stock Returns to the Construction of Optimal Portfolios," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(4), pages 505-511, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:22:y:1987:i:04:p:505-511_01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022109000012813/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:22:y:1987:i:04:p:505-511_01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jfq .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.