IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jfinqa/v10y1975i01p177-179_01.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficient Algorithms for Conducting Stochastic Dominance Tests on Large Numbers of Portfolios: A Comment

Author

Listed:
  • Frankfurter, George M.
  • Phillips, Herbert E.

Abstract

In their recent paper Porter, Wart, and Ferguson (PWF) [6] discuss the factors which they allege to be responsible for “the time-consuming nature of empirical tests of†stochastic dominance (SD) efficiency relative to Markowitz (EV) efficiency. Based upon their analysis, a number of algorithms for improving computational efficiency are offered. The “tricks†upon which applications would be based are of no concern here. Our concern is with the logical inconsistency of any attempt to compare and contrast SD and EV efficiency criteria on empirical grounds.

Suggested Citation

  • Frankfurter, George M. & Phillips, Herbert E., 1975. "Efficient Algorithms for Conducting Stochastic Dominance Tests on Large Numbers of Portfolios: A Comment," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(1), pages 177-179, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:10:y:1975:i:01:p:177-179_01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022109000018172/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Timo Kuosmanen, 2004. "Efficient Diversification According to Stochastic Dominance Criteria," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(10), pages 1390-1406, October.
    2. Shalit, Haim & Yitzhaki, Shlomo, 1985. "Evaluating the Mean-Gini Approach to Portfolio Selection," Working Papers 232632, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Center for Agricultural Economic Research.
    3. McGoun, Elton G., 1997. "Ex ungue leonem," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 6(1), pages 1-12.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:10:y:1975:i:01:p:177-179_01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Keith Waters). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jfq .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.