IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jexpos/v9y2022i3p395-406_10.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is “Constitutional Veneration” an Obstacle to Constitutional Amendment?

Author

Listed:
  • Dawes, Christopher T.
  • Zink, James R.

Abstract

Some constitutional scholars suggest that the US Constitution stands as one of the oldest yet least changed national constitutions in part because Americans’ tendency to “revere” the Constitution has left them unwilling to consider significant changes to the document. Several recent studies support aspects of this claim, but no study establishes a direct link between individuals’ respect for the Constitution and their reluctance to amend it. To address this, we replicate and extend the research design of Zink and Dawes (2016) across two survey experiments. The key difference in our experiments is we include measures of respondents’ propensity to revere the Constitution, which in turn allows us to more directly test whether constitutional veneration translates into resistance to amendment. Our results build on Zink and Dawes’s findings and show that, in addition to institutional factors, citizens’ veneration of the Constitution can act as a psychological obstacle to constitutional amendment.

Suggested Citation

  • Dawes, Christopher T. & Zink, James R., 2022. "Is “Constitutional Veneration” an Obstacle to Constitutional Amendment?," Journal of Experimental Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(3), pages 395-406, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jexpos:v:9:y:2022:i:3:p:395-406_10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2052263021000294/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jexpos:v:9:y:2022:i:3:p:395-406_10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/xps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.