IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jexpos/v9y2022i3p339-345_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rejecting Non-Paternalist Motivation: An Experimental Test

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Xianwen
  • Schøyen, Øivind

Abstract

Is people’s willingness to implement their fairness views on a group dependent on how many in the group share their view? We designed a new experiment to answer this question. Spectator participants were asked how many other participants they believe share their view of whether it is fair to redistribute income in a work task. They were then given the option to pay two cents to implement the distribution they found fair upon a pair of participants who had completed the work task. Although spectator participants systematically overestimate how many share their fairness view, being informed about the true number does not affect their decision to implement the distribution they found fair. The results suggest that people are motivated to implement their fairness view regardless of whether their view is at odds with that of those who are affected.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Xianwen & Schøyen, Øivind, 2022. "Rejecting Non-Paternalist Motivation: An Experimental Test," Journal of Experimental Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(3), pages 339-345, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jexpos:v:9:y:2022:i:3:p:339-345_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2052263021000129/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jexpos:v:9:y:2022:i:3:p:339-345_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/xps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.