IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jexpos/v5y2018i03p195-205_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do People Contrast and Assimilate Candidate Ideology? An Experimental Test of the Projection Hypothesis

Author

Listed:
  • Amira, Karyn

Abstract

In political psychology, positive projection happens when we perceive the positions of liked candidates as closer to our own positions while negative projection means we perceive the positions of disliked candidates as further from our own positions. To date, there is still confusion about whether affective feelings lead to perceptions of candidate positions or perceptions of candidate positions lead to affective feelings. This paper pins down one of these causal directions. I manipulate positive and negative feelings towards a fictitious candidate in a survey experiment to introduce them exogenously and examine whether they affect perceptions of candidate ideology. In line with some previous findings, the results indicate modest positive projection effects but no negative projection effects. Explanations for this asymmetry are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Amira, Karyn, 2018. "Do People Contrast and Assimilate Candidate Ideology? An Experimental Test of the Projection Hypothesis," Journal of Experimental Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 5(3), pages 195-205, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jexpos:v:5:y:2018:i:03:p:195-205_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2052263018000064/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jexpos:v:5:y:2018:i:03:p:195-205_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/xps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.