IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jexpos/v12y2025i2p218-236_6.html

Empathic Concern and Perspective-Taking Have Opposite Effects on Affective Polarization

Author

Listed:
  • Gillissen, Matthijs
  • Rooduijn, Matthijs
  • Schumacher, Gijs

Abstract

Empathy has been proposed as a solution to alleviate interparty antipathy. Recent findings from the US suggest that one aspect of empathy – empathic concern – increases rather than decreases affective polarization. Perspective-taking, another aspect of empathy, has no effect on affective polarization. In this article, we describe a preregistered replication and extension of these findings in the contrasting political context of the Netherlands, to see whether this relationship generalizes beyond the US. First, using a cross-sectional nationally representative sample of 1,258 Dutch voters, we show that empathic concern indeed fuels affective polarization while at the same time we find that perspective-taking reduces it. Second, using a two-arm survey experiment (n = 438), we show that perspective-taking reduces ingroup bias, whereas empathic concern does not. Reflecting on the American and Dutch findings, we conclude that while empathic concern likely contributes to affective polarization, perspective-taking may reduce it.

Suggested Citation

  • Gillissen, Matthijs & Rooduijn, Matthijs & Schumacher, Gijs, 2025. "Empathic Concern and Perspective-Taking Have Opposite Effects on Affective Polarization," Journal of Experimental Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(2), pages 218-236, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jexpos:v:12:y:2025:i:2:p:218-236_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2052263024000174/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jexpos:v:12:y:2025:i:2:p:218-236_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/xps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.