IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jexpos/v12y2025i1p42-56_4.html

Going Negative in Autocracy: A Field Experiment at the Moscow Mayoral Elections

Author

Listed:
  • Mironov, Maxim
  • Petrachkova, Alexandra

Abstract

Opposition in autocracies often uses negativism against the regime to frame its principal message. This study is the first to experimentally evaluate the effectiveness of a negative campaign on a regime candidate’s vote share. For the field experiment conducted during the 2013 Moscow mayoral election, we published a newspaper criticizing the incumbent mayor. We distributed approximately 130,000 copies near the entrances of 20 stations on four randomly selected metro lines one month prior to the election. We found that the incumbent’s vote share was 1.7 percentage points lower at the voting stations where the newspaper was distributed. These votes go to other candidates who address issues raised by the negative campaign. Anti-regime campaigning does not suppress turnout or increase disapproval voting.

Suggested Citation

  • Mironov, Maxim & Petrachkova, Alexandra, 2025. "Going Negative in Autocracy: A Field Experiment at the Moscow Mayoral Elections," Journal of Experimental Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(1), pages 42-56, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jexpos:v:12:y:2025:i:1:p:42-56_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2052263024000113/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jexpos:v:12:y:2025:i:1:p:42-56_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/xps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.