IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jexpos/v12y2025i1p17-26_2.html

Incentivizing Responses in International Organization Elite Surveys: Evidence from the World Bank

Author

Listed:
  • Heinzel, Mirko
  • Weaver, Catherine
  • Briggs, Ryan

Abstract

Scholars of International Organizations (IOs) increasingly use elite surveys to study the preferences and decisions of policymakers. When designing these surveys, one central concern is low statistical power, because respondents are typically recruited from a small and inaccessible population. However, much of what we know about how to incentivize elites to participate in surveys is based on anecdotal reflections, rather than systematic evidence on which incentives work best. In this article, we study the efficacy of three incentives in a preregistered experiment with World Bank staff. These incentives were the chance to win an Amazon voucher, a donation made to a relevant charity, and a promise to provide a detailed report on the findings. We find that no incentive outperformed the control group, and the monetary incentive decreased the number of respondents on average by one-third compared to the control group (from around 8% to around 5%).

Suggested Citation

  • Heinzel, Mirko & Weaver, Catherine & Briggs, Ryan, 2025. "Incentivizing Responses in International Organization Elite Surveys: Evidence from the World Bank," Journal of Experimental Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(1), pages 17-26, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jexpos:v:12:y:2025:i:1:p:17-26_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2052263023000398/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jexpos:v:12:y:2025:i:1:p:17-26_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/xps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.