IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jexpos/v11y2024i2p147-161_4.html

A Practical Guide to Dealing with Attrition in Political Science Experiments

Author

Listed:
  • Lo, Adeline
  • Renshon, Jonathan
  • Bassan-Nygate, Lotem

Abstract

Despite admonitions to address attrition in experiments – missingness on Y – alongside best practices designed to encourage transparency, most political science researchers all but ignore it. A quantitative literature search of this journal – where we would expect to find the most conscientious reporting of attrition – shows low rates of discussion of the issue. We suspect that there is confusion on the link between when attrition occurs and the type of validity it threatens when present, and limited connection to and guidance on which estimands are threatened by different attrition patterns. This is all exacerbated by limited tools to identify, investigate, and report patterns attrition. We offer the R package – attritevis – to visualize attrition over time, by intervention, and include a step-by-step guide to identifying and addressing attrition that balances post hoc analytical tools with guidance for revising designs to ameliorate problematic attrition.

Suggested Citation

  • Lo, Adeline & Renshon, Jonathan & Bassan-Nygate, Lotem, 2024. "A Practical Guide to Dealing with Attrition in Political Science Experiments," Journal of Experimental Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(2), pages 147-161, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jexpos:v:11:y:2024:i:2:p:147-161_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2052263023000222/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jexpos:v:11:y:2024:i:2:p:147-161_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/xps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.