IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jexpos/v11y2024i2p117-134_2.html

Ranking Candidates in Local Elections: Neither Panacea nor Catastrophe for Candidates of Color

Author

Listed:
  • Crowder-Meyer, Melody
  • Gadarian, Shana Kushner
  • Trounstine, Jessica

Abstract

Electoral rules can affect who wins and who loses elections. Most cities select office holders through plurality rule, but an alternative, ranked-choice voting (RCV), has become increasingly popular. RCV requires voters to rank candidates, instead of simply selecting their most preferred candidate. Observers debate whether RCV will cure a variety of electoral ills or undermine representation. We test the effect of RCV on voter’s choices and perceptions of representation using survey experiments with large, representative samples of respondents. We find that candidates of color are significantly penalized in both plurality and RCV elections, with no significant difference between the rule types. However, providing respondents with candidates’ partisan affiliation significantly increases support for candidates of color.

Suggested Citation

  • Crowder-Meyer, Melody & Gadarian, Shana Kushner & Trounstine, Jessica, 2024. "Ranking Candidates in Local Elections: Neither Panacea nor Catastrophe for Candidates of Color," Journal of Experimental Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(2), pages 117-134, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jexpos:v:11:y:2024:i:2:p:117-134_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2052263023000064/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jexpos:v:11:y:2024:i:2:p:117-134_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/xps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.