IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jexpos/v10y2023i1p21-33_3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Complementary or Competing Frames? The Impact of Economic and Public Health Messages on COVID-19 Attitudes

Author

Listed:
  • Knapp, Emma R.
  • Smith, Brianna A.
  • Motta, Matthew P.

Abstract

The American reaction to the COVID-19 pandemic is polarized, with conservatives often less willing to engage in risk-mitigation strategies such as mask-wearing and vaccination. COVID-19 narratives are also polarized, as some conservative elites focus on the economy over public health. In this registered report, we test whether combining economic and public health messages can persuade individuals to increase support for COVID-19 risk mitigation. We present preliminary evidence that the combination of messages is complementary, rather than competing or polarizing. When given a message emphasizing COVID-19’s negative health and economic effects in a pilot study, conservatives increased their support for a broad range of risk-mitigation strategies, while liberals maintained high levels of support. A preregistered larger-n follow-up study, however, failed to replicate this effect. While complementary frames may be a promising way to persuade voters on some issues, they may also struggle to overcome high levels of existing polarization.

Suggested Citation

  • Knapp, Emma R. & Smith, Brianna A. & Motta, Matthew P., 2023. "Complementary or Competing Frames? The Impact of Economic and Public Health Messages on COVID-19 Attitudes," Journal of Experimental Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(1), pages 21-33, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jexpos:v:10:y:2023:i:1:p:21-33_3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2052263022000069/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jexpos:v:10:y:2023:i:1:p:21-33_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/xps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.