IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jechis/v86y2026i2p460-500_5.html

Winners and Losers from the Protestant Reformation: An Analysis of the Network of European Universities

Author

Listed:
  • de la Croix, David
  • Morault, Pauline

Abstract

Using a new database of European academics, we build a network of universities that is based on professors’ mobility. We describe how the network was altered following the Protestant Reformation. We focus on fragmentation and on universities’ centrality. Dyadic regressions confirm that geography and vernacular languages were important for mobility, but did not substitute for religion. We compare simulated networks with and without religious identity. Most universities lose centrality in the simulated religious network compared to the non-religious one. As publications per university are correlated with centrality, the loss of connectedness of many universities after the Reformation contributed to their scientific decline.

Suggested Citation

  • de la Croix, David & Morault, Pauline, 2026. "Winners and Losers from the Protestant Reformation: An Analysis of the Network of European Universities," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 86(2), pages 460-500, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jechis:v:86:y:2026:i:2:p:460-500_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022050725101058/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jechis:v:86:y:2026:i:2:p:460-500_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jeh .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.