IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jechis/v85y2025i3p664-700_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Voting Rights and Media Sentiment: Evidence from Early Suffrage States

Author

Listed:
  • Saavedra, Martin

Abstract

Did women’s suffrage affect media sentiment toward voting rights and narratives about women more generally? I identify pro- and anti-suffrage language using publications that explicitly argued for or against early voting reform. I then measure media sentiment using language in newspapers and topic modeling to identify common themes about either suffrage or women. Difference-in-differences estimates show that newspaper coverage of suffrage increased when women won the vote but then declined below baseline. Newspaper sentiment moved in opposition to the status quo, with average sentiment becoming more anti-suffrage. Lastly, suffrage increased discussions of women in politics for several years.

Suggested Citation

  • Saavedra, Martin, 2025. "Voting Rights and Media Sentiment: Evidence from Early Suffrage States," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 85(3), pages 664-700, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jechis:v:85:y:2025:i:3:p:664-700_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022050725100818/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jechis:v:85:y:2025:i:3:p:664-700_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jeh .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.