IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jbcoan/v14y2023i1p141-161_8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Discounting in Natural Resource Damage Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Horsch, Eric
  • Phaneuf, Daniel
  • Giguere, Chris
  • Murray, Jason
  • Duff, Cameron
  • Kroninger, Cole

Abstract

The goal of natural resource damage assessment (NRDA) is to compensate the public for losses to natural resources from past or ongoing hazardous releases, including losses that may persist into the future. Compensation is delivered in the form of restoration projects. Resolving NRDA liability requires balancing losses and restoration benefits over multiple decades and converting them into a present value for calculating appropriate damages. For the past two decades, NRDA practitioners have used a real discount rate of 3 % to convert losses and benefits to a present value equivalent. That rate was based, in part, on real historical yields on risk-free debt (e.g., the real rate of return on 3-month Treasury bills). Declining interest rates on risk-free debt in recent years has led to suggestions to reexamine the historical consensus discount rate. This paper reviews two alternative conceptual paradigms for selecting a discount rate in NRDA cases: the social rate of time preference and discount rates for tort cases. We summarize historical data for empirically implementing the two paradigms and discuss the ramifications of the different options. Based on our review, we suggest maintaining the 3 % consensus as a practical solution to a range of empirical candidates within the two conceptual paradigms.

Suggested Citation

  • Horsch, Eric & Phaneuf, Daniel & Giguere, Chris & Murray, Jason & Duff, Cameron & Kroninger, Cole, 2023. "Discounting in Natural Resource Damage Assessment," Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(1), pages 141-161, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jbcoan:v:14:y:2023:i:1:p:141-161_8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2194588822000240/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jbcoan:v:14:y:2023:i:1:p:141-161_8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/bca .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.