IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jagaec/v57y2025i3p514-543_9.html

How Do Preference and Perception of Risks Affect Willingness-To-Pay for Food Safety?

Author

Listed:
  • Huang, Kuan-Ming
  • Etienne, Xiaoli
  • Sant’Anna, Ana Claudia

Abstract

Foodborne illnesses are costly to society and have been associated with local produce. The affordable “3-step wash” cleaning procedure was designed to reduce pathogens on produce. We estimate consumer willingness to pay (WTP) for food safety (i.e. 3-step washed), prepackage, and sales location attributes in locally grown produce (e.g., lettuce). On average, consumers are willing to pay $1.46 more for 3-step washed and $0.30 more for prepackaged lettuce. Additionally, consumers are willing to pay $0.16 more for fresh produce sold in natural stores and farmers markets compared to supermarkets, but $0.22 less for produce sold in other direct-to-consumer locations such as roadside stands. Higher WTP for the food safety attribute is associated with consumers who have greater risk aversion, less knowledge of foodborne illness, and stricter food safety cleaning and handling practices. Consumers highly concerned about foodborne risks also show higher WTP for both food safety and prepackage attributes. These findings can guide local farmers in making decisions about adopting pathogen-reduction cleaning procedures, selecting sales locations, and developing effective marketing strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Huang, Kuan-Ming & Etienne, Xiaoli & Sant’Anna, Ana Claudia, 2025. "How Do Preference and Perception of Risks Affect Willingness-To-Pay for Food Safety?," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 57(3), pages 514-543, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jagaec:v:57:y:2025:i:3:p:514-543_9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1074070825000148/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jagaec:v:57:y:2025:i:3:p:514-543_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/aae .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.