IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jagaec/v55y2023i4p710-729_7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Alternative Livestock Revolution: Prospects for Consumer Acceptance of Plant-based and Cultured Meat in South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Tsvakirai, Chiedza
  • Nalley, Lawton
  • Rider, Shelby
  • Van Loo, Ellen
  • Tshehla, Makgopa

Abstract

Although South Africa accounts for half of the alternative meat market for the African continent, there remains a lack of information about consumer demand for plant-based and lab-cultured meat and its market potential domestically. This study reports the results of a nationwide survey of 649 South African consumers who completed a choice experiment in which they selected among conventional beef and three alternative burger patties at varying prices. Results indicate that holding prices constant and conditional on choosing a food product, 21% of the market share was estimated for plant-based meat alternatives and 38% for lab-cultured meat.

Suggested Citation

  • Tsvakirai, Chiedza & Nalley, Lawton & Rider, Shelby & Van Loo, Ellen & Tshehla, Makgopa, 2023. "The Alternative Livestock Revolution: Prospects for Consumer Acceptance of Plant-based and Cultured Meat in South Africa," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 55(4), pages 710-729, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jagaec:v:55:y:2023:i:4:p:710-729_7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1074070823000366/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jagaec:v:55:y:2023:i:4:p:710-729_7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/aae .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.