IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jagaec/v51y2019i01p49-68_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic Feasibility Of Anaerobic Digestion With Swine Operations

Author

Listed:
  • COWLEY, CORTNEY A.
  • BRORSEN, B. WADE
  • HAMILTON, DOUGLAS W.

Abstract

Anaerobic digestion systems can reduce greenhouse gas emissions while turning waste products into energy. Past U.S. economic research on anaerobic digesters has studied dairy farms, but limited economic information is available on anaerobic digestion systems for swine. Net present values (NPVs) were calculated for biodigesters and covered lagoons under different coproduct and policy scenarios. With no government intervention, covered lagoons are more promising for swine operations than more capital-intensive biodigesters. As there is interest in subsidizing anaerobic digestion systems, subsidies equal to a $38/t social cost of carbon would provide positive NPVs.

Suggested Citation

  • Cowley, Cortney A. & Brorsen, B. Wade & Hamilton, Douglas W., 2019. "Economic Feasibility Of Anaerobic Digestion With Swine Operations," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 51(1), pages 49-68, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jagaec:v:51:y:2019:i:01:p:49-68_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1074070818000202/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ribaudo, Marc & Kaplan, Jonathan D. & Christensen, Lee A. & Gollehon, Noel R. & Johansson, Robert C. & Breneman, Vincent E. & Aillery, Marcel P. & Agapoff, Jean & Peters, Mark, 2003. "Manure Management For Water Quality Costs To Animal Feeding Operations Of Applying Manure Nutrients To Land," Agricultural Economic Reports 33911, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. Canning, Patrick N. & Charles, Ainsley & Huang, Sonja & Polenske, Karen R. & Waters, Arnold, 2010. "Energy Use in the U.S. Food System," Economic Research Report 59381, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    3. Canning, Patrick N., 2010. "Fuel for Food: Energy Use in the U.S. Food System," Amber Waves:The Economics of Food, Farming, Natural Resources, and Rural America, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, pages 1-6.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abbe Hamilton & Stephen B. Balogh & Adrienna Maxwell & Charles A. S. Hall, 2013. "Efficiency of Edible Agriculture in Canada and the U.S. Over the Past Three and Four Decades," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-30, March.
    2. Boehm, Rebecca & Wilde, Parke E. & Ver Ploeg, Michele & Costello, Christine & Cash, Sean B., 2018. "A Comprehensive Life Cycle Assessment of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from U.S. Household Food Choices," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 67-76.
    3. Maria Zuba-Ciszewska & Aneta Suchoń, 2024. "The Role of State Aid in the Achievement of the Energy Efficiency Objective in the Food Industry—The Example of Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-32, June.
    4. Hilario Becerril & Ignacio De los Rios, 2016. "Energy Efficiency Strategies for Ecological Greenhouses: Experiences from Murcia (Spain)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-23, October.
    5. Canning, Patrick & Rehkamp, Sarah, 2016. "The Effects of a CO2 Emissions Tax on American Diets," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 235928, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    6. Peters, Christian J. & Picardy, Jamie A. & Darrouzet-Nardi, Amelia & Griffin, Timothy S., 2014. "Feed conversions, ration compositions, and land use efficiencies of major livestock products in U.S. agricultural systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 35-43.
    7. Sabine O’Hara & Sigamoney Naicker, 2022. "Local Commitment and Global Reach: Advancing Sustainable Capacity Building in Higher Education," World, MDPI, vol. 3(4), pages 1-19, October.
    8. Baboo Lesh Gowreesunker & Savvas Tassou & James Atuonwu, 2018. "Cost-Energy Optimum Pathway for the UK Food Manufacturing Industry to Meet the UK National Emission Targets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-19, October.
    9. Rehkamp, Sarah & Canning, Patrick, 2016. "The Effects of American Diets on Food System Energy Use," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 235896, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    10. Carlos Francisco Terneus Páez & Oswaldo Viteri Salazar, 2022. "The Water–Energy–Food Nexus: An Analysis of Food Sustainability in Ecuador," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-21, September.
    11. Joseph R. Burger & James H. Brown & John W. Day & Tatiana P. Flanagan & Eric D. Roy, 2019. "The Central Role of Energy in the Urban Transition: Global Challenges for Sustainability," Biophysical Economics and Resource Quality, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 1-13, March.
    12. Rae Zimmerman & Quanyan Zhu & Carolyn Dimitri, 2016. "Promoting resilience for food, energy, and water interdependencies," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 6(1), pages 50-61, March.
    13. Erika Allen Wolters & Brent S. Steel & Sydney Anderson & Heather Moline, 2021. "The Future of Food: Understanding Public Preferences for the Management of Agricultural Resources," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-20, June.
    14. Wang, Yixuan & Desai, Saumya & Kemmerling, Leonie & Trmcic, Aljosa & Wiedmann, Martin & Adalja, Aaron A., 2024. "Dynamic pricing to reducing dairy food waste: Evidence from lab and grocery store experiments," 2024 Annual Meeting, July 28-30, New Orleans, LA 343665, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    15. Key, Nigel D. & Kaplan, Jonathan D., 2007. "Multiple Environmental Externalities and Manure Management Policy," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 32(01), pages 1-20, April.
    16. Colyer, Dale, 2004. "Environmental Regulations And Competitiveness," Working Papers 19100, West Virginia University, Department of Agricultural Resource Economics.
    17. Haluk Gedikoglu & Sansel Tandogan & Joseph Parcell, 2023. "Neighbor effects on adoption of conservation practices: cases of grass filter systems and injecting manure," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 70(3), pages 723-756, June.
    18. MacDonald, James M. & O'Donoghue, Erik J. & McBride, William D. & Nehring, Richard F. & Sandretto, Carmen L. & Mosheim, Roberto, 2007. "Profits, Costs, and the Changing Structure of Dairy Farming," Economic Research Report 6704, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    19. Johansson, Robert & Peters, Mark & House, Robert, 2007. "Regional Environment and Agriculture Programming Model," Technical Bulletins 184314, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    20. Roubík, Hynek & Mazancová, Jana & Phung, Le Dinh & Banout, Jan, 2018. "Current approach to manure management for small-scale Southeast Asian farmers - Using Vietnamese biogas and non-biogas farms as an example," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 362-370.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jagaec:v:51:y:2019:i:01:p:49-68_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/aae .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.