IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jagaec/v27y1995i01p197-211_01.html

Examination of Alternative Heteroscedastic Error Structures Using Experimental Data

Author

Listed:
  • Mjelde, James W.
  • Capps, Oral
  • Griffin, Ronald C.

Abstract

Impacts of alternative specifications for heteroscedastic error structures are examined by estimating various production functions for corn in Central Texas. Production- and profit-maximizing levels of inputs and the shape of the profit equation obtained from models not corrected for heteroscedasticity differed from those obtained from models corrected for heteroscedasticity. Using the profit-maximizing input levels for each production function gave essentially the same estimated yield and profit, regardless of the specification for heteroscedasticity employed. Differences of up to one-quarter to one-third are noted, however, in the amount of profit-maximizing levels of inputs used, depending on the heteroscedasticity correction.

Suggested Citation

  • Mjelde, James W. & Capps, Oral & Griffin, Ronald C., 1995. "Examination of Alternative Heteroscedastic Error Structures Using Experimental Data," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 27(1), pages 197-211, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jagaec:v:27:y:1995:i:01:p:197-211_01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1074070800019738/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Larson, James A. & Roberts, Roland K. & Gwathmey, C. Owen, 2006. "Effects of Herbicide-Resistant Technology Fees on the Plant Population Decision for Cotton Production," 2006 Annual meeting, July 23-26, Long Beach, CA 21208, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jagaec:v:27:y:1995:i:01:p:197-211_01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/aae .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.