IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jagaec/v15y1983i02p35-39_01.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using Dual Objectives as Decision Guides to Hedge Oklahoma Feeder Cattle—An Economic Evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Russell, James R.
  • Dickey, Matthew C.

Abstract

The continued volatility of feeder cattle prices sustains interest in hedging strategies. The stocker operator may use technical or fundamental analysis for decision guides in the hedging program. Alternatively, the stocker operator could use profit objectives to guide the operator's hedging decisions. Previous works have developed strategies based on technical tools such as moving averages (Lehenbauer), point and figure analysis (Lehenbauer), and oscillators (Russell and Franzmann). Similarly, strategies have been developed that use fundamental analysis as a decision aid (Brown). However, no work has examined, in detail, strategies based on a management by objective philosophy—although at times the popular press has emphasized this approach (Farm Futures).

Suggested Citation

  • Russell, James R. & Dickey, Matthew C., 1983. "Using Dual Objectives as Decision Guides to Hedge Oklahoma Feeder Cattle—An Economic Evaluation," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(2), pages 35-39, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jagaec:v:15:y:1983:i:02:p:35-39_01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0081305200016228/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jagaec:v:15:y:1983:i:02:p:35-39_01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/aae .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.